N D Savla & Associates
+91 98219 32683 | +91 97650 00966 | +91 9765 000 388 | info@ndsavla.in
ndsavla.in logo

Trademark Infringement Notice – Protecting Your Registered Trademark Against Unauthorised Use

Cease and Desist Letters, Infringement Actions, and Enforcement of Registered Trademark Rights Under the Trade Marks Act, 1999

Trademark infringement occurs when a person, without the registered proprietor's consent, uses in the course of trade a mark that is identical with, or deceptively similar to, a registered trademark — in relation to identical or similar goods or services — in a manner likely to cause confusion in the minds of the public. Infringement of a registered trademark is governed by Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and gives the registered proprietor the right to seek civil remedies including injunctions, damages, accounts of profits, and delivery up and destruction of infringing goods, as well as criminal remedies under Section 103 including imprisonment of up to 3 years and fine.

In addition to registered trademark infringement under Section 29, unregistered mark owners can pursue the common law tort of passing off — protecting against misrepresentation of the infringer's goods or services as those of the claimant, causing damage to goodwill. Our trademark enforcement service covers pre-litigation enforcement (cease and desist notices), civil suits for injunction and damages, police complaints for criminal infringement, customs recordal, and e-commerce platform brand protection. This service connects with our registration and rectification services.

Our Trademark Infringement Enforcement Services

Infringement Assessment

Detailed analysis of the alleged infringement — comparing the infringing mark with the registered mark, assessing deceptive similarity, and evaluating the strength of the infringement case before taking enforcement action.

Cease and Desist Notice

Drafting and sending of a cease and desist letter to the infringer — demanding immediate cessation of the infringing use, delivery up of infringing goods, and damages — as the first step in the enforcement process.

Civil Suit for Injunction and Damages

Filing of a civil suit before the District Court or High Court under Section 29 — seeking temporary and permanent injunctions, damages or account of profits, and delivery up and destruction of infringing goods.

Criminal Complaint for Infringement

Filing of a police complaint or magistrate complaint under Section 103 of the Trade Marks Act for criminal trademark infringement — which carries imprisonment of up to 3 years and a fine of up to Rs 2 lakh.

Customs Recordal for Border Protection

Recording the registered trademark with Indian Customs under the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 — enabling seizure of counterfeit goods at the border.

E-Commerce Platform Enforcement

Filing of trademark infringement complaints on Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho, and other e-commerce platforms — requiring removal of infringing listings and seller account suspension.

Why Swift Trademark Enforcement Protects Your Brand

  • Unaddressed infringement creates a public record of tolerance — which can undermine the strength of the mark and complicate future enforcement actions
  • A cease and desist notice is the fastest and most cost-effective enforcement step — many infringers comply without litigation when formally put on notice
  • An interim injunction from the court immediately stops the infringing use — preventing ongoing revenue loss and consumer confusion during the litigation
  • Criminal action creates significant deterrence — the prospect of police investigation and criminal prosecution motivates rapid compliance
  • Customs recordal provides automatic border protection — counterfeit imports are seized without the proprietor needing to monitor every shipment individually
  • E-commerce platform takedowns are enforceable within 24–48 hours in many cases — providing near-immediate relief against online infringement

Frequently Asked Questions

What constitutes trademark infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act?
Under Section 29, trademark infringement occurs when a person, without the registered proprietor's consent, uses in the course of trade a mark identical to or deceptively similar to a registered mark — in relation to identical or similar goods or services — in a manner likely to cause confusion or association. Section 29 also covers use of a mark identical to a registered mark on dissimilar goods or services where the registered mark has a reputation in India and use takes unfair advantage of or is detrimental to the distinctive character or reputation of the registered mark.
What is the difference between trademark infringement and passing off?
Trademark infringement (Section 29) is a statutory remedy available only to the owner of a registered trademark. Passing off is a common law remedy available to any person — whether or not their mark is registered — who can establish: (a) goodwill or reputation in the mark; (b) a misrepresentation by the defendant causing or likely to cause confusion; and (c) actual or likely damage to the claimant's goodwill. Passing off protects unregistered marks but requires proof of goodwill and misrepresentation — making it more difficult to establish than registered trademark infringement.
What interim relief is available in a trademark infringement suit?
The registered proprietor can apply to the court for an ex parte interim injunction — without the infringer being present — at the earliest stage of the suit. Courts will grant an interim injunction if the claimant can demonstrate: (a) a prima facie case of infringement; (b) that the balance of convenience favours the grant of the injunction; and (c) that irreparable harm will be caused if the injunction is not granted. An interim injunction is the most powerful immediate remedy — it stops the infringement instantly pending final disposal of the suit.
What damages can I recover in a trademark infringement suit?
In a successful trademark infringement suit under Section 29, the court can award: compensatory damages (actual financial loss suffered); the defendant's profits earned through infringement (account of profits); delivery up and destruction of infringing goods, packaging, labels, and promotional materials; and costs of the litigation. Courts in India have increasingly awarded significant damages in trademark cases — particularly in cases involving deliberate, large-scale infringement by commercial counterfeiters.
Can I take action against online trademark infringement on e-commerce platforms?
Yes. Registered trademark owners can file complaints on major Indian e-commerce platforms — Amazon.in (via the Amazon Brand Registry), Flipkart, Meesho, Nykaa, and others — for removal of infringing product listings. Most platforms have a brand protection programme and will remove listings and suspend seller accounts upon receiving a valid trademark registration certificate and infringement complaint. We manage platform infringement complaints alongside legal cease and desist and court-based enforcement.

Take Action Against Trademark Infringement

Cease and desist notices, civil suits, criminal complaints, and e-commerce enforcement for registered trademark owners.

Contact Us Today